The Tesla Model 3 Will Launch With 5. Wh And 7. 5 k. Wh Batteries. We know a pretty decent amount about the Tesla Model 3 so far, but until just recently we didn’t know a ton about what kind of batteries those cars will pack out of the gate. Now we do! Elon Musk let it slip during a conference call that the new electric sport sedan comes in 5. Wh and 7. 5 k. Wh flavors. Among my many strange, off- putting car fetishes, there’s one that is consistently, creepily…Read more That news comes to us from Electrek, which has been reporting that Tesla’s less focused on the battery naming scheme for the more mainstream Model 3 and more on its actual range instead in order to appeal to a wider audience. Which is fair—for a lot of people, 5. Wh, 7. 5 k. Wh and 1. Wh probably don’t mean a ton yet, except for the obvious fact that bigger is better and faster. The news site says Musk revealed during a conference call hosted by Goldman Sachs for bondholders that the Model 3 will have a pack just over 5. Wh with a range of about 2. Wh pack good for about 3. That larger battery is expected to cost about $9,0. Why, besides range, does this matter? The Tampa Bay Lighting, Rays, and Buccaneers have just released a joint statement in which they offer to provide financial resources necessary to remove a Confederate. Because it has wider implications for investors: The information is especially important to investors who are attempting to estimate the cost of the Model 3 in an attempt to model ways that Tesla can achieve its targeted 2. For example, at $1. Wh, the Model 3 battery packs would cost between $7,5. A few dollar difference per k. Wh or a few k. Wh difference per battery capacity can make a significant overall impact on the cost of the electric car. Tesla had previously disclosed that its battery pack cost was “below 1.
Wh” and they aim for Gigafactory production to reduce the cost by 3. Musk also said that he would be disappointed if they don’t bring the cost below $1. Wh by the end of the decade. At any rate, don’t expect a high- performance Model 3 variant until sometime next year at the earliest (assuming no delays, and you know how this company is with those) and that it won’t get the 1. Wh pack from the larger Model S and Model X due to size constraints. Illinois Wants To Ban Location Tracking Without Consent. It’s increasingly difficult to do anything on your phone nowadays without sharing your geolocation information. Certain Snapchat filters, Facebook status updates, Instagrams, and even text messages are all potentially tied to geolocation data. It’s relatively simple for app developers to build in geolocation functionality—and many services require users to opt- in to sharing location data. But now the state of Illinois wants ensure that all companies extracting geolocation data from individuals must provide an opt- in, or else they’ll have to pay up. Last week, both houses of the Illinois state legislature passed the Geolocation Privacy Protection Act (HB3. Now, it’s on the desk of Governor Bruce Rauner, waiting to be signed into law. If signed, companies would be required to inform users of how they’re using the location data they collect, if the users decides to share it. Companies who don’t adhere would be in violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and would face criminal penalties and damages of at least $1,0. There are a few exceptions to the law. For instance, private entities can collect geolocation data without consent if the information will help parents find missing children or aid firefighters, police, or medical professionals. The new law might not have a huge real- world impact, given that most devices and apps already ask people for permission before they start using location data. But this might encourage more tech companies and app developers to give users the option to opt out of being tracked. There have been plenty of times in the past when companies have faced repercussions for tracking users without their consent. For instance, Apple and Uber have been sued for allegedly tracking un- notified users. Ari Scharg, director of the Digital Privacy Alliance (DPA), told Gizmodo that the organization has done reports on the apps Selfie. Rate Selfie Pic Hot Or Not, which give developers precise GPS coordinates whenever a person uploads a photo.“When a person is just browsing through the photos to rate them, if they were intercepting the backend traffic, they would be able to get the GPS coordinates of each person they viewed,” Scharg said. Overall, a person could use this information to stalk someone or the owner of the picture could retaliate against a person that left a bad comment if they were capturing the traffic.”The DPA urges app developers to be transparent with users by clarifying how location data is being used. The organization has been advocating for the bill, and even wrote an open letter to Governor Rauner, which was signed by more than 2. Chicago- area tech companies. Illinois has a reputation of passing strict data privacy legislation. The state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act prohibits tech companies from using biometric identifiers—like face scans and fingerprints—without consent. Their Right To Know Act—which passed in May, but was put on hold—requires companies such as Facebook, Amazon, and Google to disclose what data has been collected from consumers and shared with third parties.[Naked Security].
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2018
Categories |